After losing his starting position, former University of North Carolina guard Larry Drew II asked to transfer from the school. What can we learn as athletic administrators from his great show of teamwork and fortitude?
Drew left school after his parents allegedly pressed for the coaching staff to move their son back to a starting position after spending four games coming off the bench. They then approved their son's departure from the team when he wasn't reinstated as the team's starting point guard.
While this is a college-level incident, this type of thing has occurred for years at the high school level. Over-zealous, unrealistic parents place demands upon a coach or athletic administrator and create a ruckus when they don't get their way.
It is purported that athletics is a great vehicle to develop life-long values. One has to wonder what can we take away from this example?
Here are some critical points for athletic administrators to consider in times like these:
1. Parents may not be the most realistic judge of their child's athletic ability. Love usually overrides logic and reason.
2. All rules, policies and procedures are great until they directly affect a parent's child.
3. While athletics does not develop character, it is revealed in participation and competition.
Athletics is, after all, a privilege and not a right. Being part of a team and how much one plays should be based upon what is done in practice and what is best in terms of the team--not individuals. Demands from unrealistic parents cannot be allowed to influence this critical part of education.
Dr. David Hoch, CMAA
CollegeCharlie is irreverent news and commentary concerning big-time college sports. It's all about the money and has little to do with education. Some politics thrown in as well.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
It's all about ME!
![]() |
Please watch this video |
Such attitudes are not just found in middle- or high schools. The colleges have their share of prima donas. Bobby was a high school stud. He was offered scholarships by several schools. Yet if he doesn't get significant playing time as a freshman, he complains and wants to transfer.
Or worse, look at the pros, particularly the NFL. A defensive lineman sacks the opposing quarterback, then jumps up and pounds his chest. Look at me, look at me. Well he practices sacking quarterbacks every day in practice. He gets paid to sack quarterbacks. Sacking quarterbacks is his job. Why celebrate or call attention to oneself for doing what is expected of you? Oh well. Nobody asked me.
Please see Look at me
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Money, Money, Money. But not for education
It's the basketball time of year referred to as March Madness. Millions, maybe even billions of dollars will change hands for game tickets, colas, popcorn and hotdogs, and parking by fans. Television will rake in millions in advertising.
Two years ago CBS promised the NCAA $6 billion for the rights to televise tournament games for 10 years. Pretty good wad of money there. Where does it all go? Obviously the participating basketball teams will get some of it, depending how far in the brackets they advance. This will allow those schools to pay expenses for participating in the tournament. I suppose that most of the coaches have an incentive clause in their contracts, so they will get a portion. But one thing is for sure: The Biology professors at the university won't get a dime of this money.
March Madness is all about education, isn't it? Maybe every school in the tournament has a major in basketball or entertainment or tattooing or proper use of the F-word on the court or bench area.
Why do we need a national champion in any sport? Bragging rights? Is a national champion school a better school academically? Didn't I read in my newspaper that 23 of the 64 teams in this year's tournament failed the APR (academic performance rating) criteria. This caused the Knight Commission, which is an academic watchdog of big time college sports, to publicly call for having the acceptable APR numbers as a qualification for participating in the tournament. Where are the college presidents in supporting this proposal?
Folks, people in this country don't care about anything but winning. They don't care if their gladiators go to class, or commit a felony as long as MY University beats the crap out of yours. An APR? Who gives a s**t about that stuff. Besides these aren't really college teams, but NBA minor league franchises that are allowed to use college names and venues. This tournament has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with education.
Please visit College Sports by Charlie for the most irreverent news and commentary.
Two years ago CBS promised the NCAA $6 billion for the rights to televise tournament games for 10 years. Pretty good wad of money there. Where does it all go? Obviously the participating basketball teams will get some of it, depending how far in the brackets they advance. This will allow those schools to pay expenses for participating in the tournament. I suppose that most of the coaches have an incentive clause in their contracts, so they will get a portion. But one thing is for sure: The Biology professors at the university won't get a dime of this money.
March Madness is all about education, isn't it? Maybe every school in the tournament has a major in basketball or entertainment or tattooing or proper use of the F-word on the court or bench area.
Why do we need a national champion in any sport? Bragging rights? Is a national champion school a better school academically? Didn't I read in my newspaper that 23 of the 64 teams in this year's tournament failed the APR (academic performance rating) criteria. This caused the Knight Commission, which is an academic watchdog of big time college sports, to publicly call for having the acceptable APR numbers as a qualification for participating in the tournament. Where are the college presidents in supporting this proposal?
Folks, people in this country don't care about anything but winning. They don't care if their gladiators go to class, or commit a felony as long as MY University beats the crap out of yours. An APR? Who gives a s**t about that stuff. Besides these aren't really college teams, but NBA minor league franchises that are allowed to use college names and venues. This tournament has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with education.
Please visit College Sports by Charlie for the most irreverent news and commentary.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Going to extreme measures for child athletes
Like many other American teens, 14-year-old Nick Heras wants to be a professional quarterback someday.
Unlike most teens, he has left home and moved across the country to attend an elite athletic training program. His family foots a hefty bill for Nick's dreams: More than $50,000 a year.
The Haves and Have-Nots ... the rich get richer and poor stay that way
The University of Texas' groundbreaking $300 million, 20-year television deal with ESPN has generated considerable praise for the financial windfall it could create for the university. However, it's also fueled plenty of discussion about competitive balance, and the even bigger gap between the haves and have nots in big-time college athletics.
National Signing Day 2011: Which Top Recruiting Classes Will Suffer the Most?
Andy Rooney and Prayer
Andy Rooney said it on 60 MINUTES
I don't believe in Santa Claus, but I'm not going to sue somebody for singing a Ho-Ho-Ho song in December. I don't agree with Darwin, but I didn't go out and hire a lawyer when my high school teacher taught his Theory of Evolution.
Life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness will not be endangered because someone says a 30-second prayer before a football game.
Back when I was a boy a Coke was 5 cents, gasoline was 30 cents and No meant No!
Read these and more at our website. http://www.collegecharlie.com/
Like many other American teens, 14-year-old Nick Heras wants to be a professional quarterback someday.
Unlike most teens, he has left home and moved across the country to attend an elite athletic training program. His family foots a hefty bill for Nick's dreams: More than $50,000 a year.
The Haves and Have-Nots ... the rich get richer and poor stay that way
The University of Texas' groundbreaking $300 million, 20-year television deal with ESPN has generated considerable praise for the financial windfall it could create for the university. However, it's also fueled plenty of discussion about competitive balance, and the even bigger gap between the haves and have nots in big-time college athletics.
National Signing Day 2011: Which Top Recruiting Classes Will Suffer the Most?
Andy Rooney and Prayer
Andy Rooney said it on 60 MINUTES
I don't believe in Santa Claus, but I'm not going to sue somebody for singing a Ho-Ho-Ho song in December. I don't agree with Darwin, but I didn't go out and hire a lawyer when my high school teacher taught his Theory of Evolution.
Life, liberty or your pursuit of happiness will not be endangered because someone says a 30-second prayer before a football game.
Back when I was a boy a Coke was 5 cents, gasoline was 30 cents and No meant No!
Read these and more at our website. http://www.collegecharlie.com/
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
The Haves and Have-Nots ... the rich get richer and the poor stay that way
The University of Texas' groundbreaking $300 million, 20-year television deal with ESPN has generated considerable praise for the financial windfall it could create for the university. However, it's also fueled plenty of discussion about competitive balance, and the even bigger gap between the haves and have nots in big-time college athletics.
Recruiting advantage? What you say, NCAA? Fox Sports will now cut a deal with say, Alabama? This will cause another arms race among the college elite. And college is about education? Yeah, what fool believes that? Where does the NCAA fit into all this? Do they get a share of the $300 million? No, because the NCAA no longer controls college football. Television and conference commissioners do the talkin' for football at the FBS level.
It's all about the money and has nothing to do with education. And most people don't care. We now have colleges so that we can have football teams.
Television has also made national signing day a redneck circus.... and more profits for networks. But hey, it's about math, science and history, right? Or maybe producing doctors, educators, and missionaries instead of defensive tackles? Naw. Roll Tide, go 'Horns, gettem Ducks.
Recruiting advantage? What you say, NCAA? Fox Sports will now cut a deal with say, Alabama? This will cause another arms race among the college elite. And college is about education? Yeah, what fool believes that? Where does the NCAA fit into all this? Do they get a share of the $300 million? No, because the NCAA no longer controls college football. Television and conference commissioners do the talkin' for football at the FBS level.
It's all about the money and has nothing to do with education. And most people don't care. We now have colleges so that we can have football teams.
Television has also made national signing day a redneck circus.... and more profits for networks. But hey, it's about math, science and history, right? Or maybe producing doctors, educators, and missionaries instead of defensive tackles? Naw. Roll Tide, go 'Horns, gettem Ducks.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
BetEd Sportsbook Review
Hey, if you get a thrill - and make some bucks - with online sports betting, I hear this is one of the best. I make a few cents if you click the link. Go ahead, do it. I dare you to click the link.
As one of the top 10 reputable online sportsbooks, betEd offers NCAAF college football odds and is dedicated to providing a top notch gaming experience in a secure betting environment. It is ideally suited to recreational bettors. With the industry's most user friendly gaming software and top notch customer service, the user experience is rated 4.5/5 and the functionality of the website is fast, easy to use and hassle free.
Click Here
As one of the top 10 reputable online sportsbooks, betEd offers NCAAF college football odds and is dedicated to providing a top notch gaming experience in a secure betting environment. It is ideally suited to recreational bettors. With the industry's most user friendly gaming software and top notch customer service, the user experience is rated 4.5/5 and the functionality of the website is fast, easy to use and hassle free.
Click Here
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Please watch this video.
In over 40 years of coaching and being an athletics administrator, this video says it all about today's young athletes and their parents. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iymXdRQDISg&feature=player_embedded
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)